Sunday, May 13, 2018

Event Blog 2



For this event post I visited the Fowler Museum on UCLA’s own campus. The central theme of Fowler’s many exhibits was culture and how culture is infused into all artwork. A parallel I continually found myself making as I walked the halls of the Fowler related to our topic of the two cultures: art and science. Art serves as a form of expression for culture but is also a unifying factor across cultures. As I was walking around I couldn’t stop thinking about how art succeeds in uniting so many diverse cultures, but is so disparate from the culture of science. Until revisiting the first weeks material I was forgetting that at a time science and art were united fields, inseparable from one another. Then I realized that science and art are not two opposing cultures in practice, only in view. The world has stopped viewing science as a form of art, but that does not make the divide legitimate. If this class has taught me one thing it is that art is infused into everything we see and everything we do. Art is where you choose to see it. The precision of a doctors scalpel, the stroke of a paintbrush, the creation of a microchip, it is all art.
            The next thing that struck me in the Fowler related to technology and its interaction with art. Not exactly in the way that technology is art, but in the way that it enhances our ability to learn experience art. One exhibit in Fowler had disposable earphones that you could wear to be guided through the exhibit, learning about the artists intentions and all the intricate details about the art itself. There were also many exhibits that had a small silver telephone that you could hold to your ear to hear audio that was specifically created to accompany the art. In this way technology is allowing artists to expand the reach of their artwork. They can invoke more emotion by incorporating all of your senses while you interact with their works. Technology also helps the public to understand art. While it is important for every person to develop their own opinions and interpretations of artwork, it is very useful to hear the artist or a professional describe the background of a piece. Many studies have proven the important of arts education, an technology is directly influencing an improvement in the publics art education.

Works Cited

Charney, Noah. “The Art of Learning: Why Art History Might Be the Most Important Subject You Could Study Today.” Salon, Salon.com, 16 Jan. 2017



Snow, C. P. “Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution.” Reading. 1959. New York: Cambridge UP, 1961. 

Print.

Snow, C.P. The Two Cultures: And a Second Look. N.p.: n.p., 1963. Print.

Robertson, Katrin Oddleifson. “How the Arts Can Help Struggling Learners.” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 25 May 2012.

Week 6: BioTech + Art


     To me, this weeks section on biotechnology feels like the culmination of two previous units, Medtech + Art and Math + Art. During the Math + Art section we learned how math helped artists create the perfect proportions for humans, buildings, and animals alike. The medtech portion showed how medicine is an art form in and of itself. Biotechnology is the fusion of these two sections in that it directly allows humans to create living tissues and modify genes. Through biotechnology we can be the artists who design our own children or ourselves. Gene modification allows soon-to-be parents to specify the traits they want their children to have, essentially allowing you to build the child of your dreams. This also extends past physical appearance. Gene modification can be used to help children avoid cancer as well as other life threatening illnesses or deformations.
     The movie Gattaca explores potential issues with gene modification. In this futuristic society, every individual has been perfected en utero which has led every individual who was not modified to be segregated and oppressed. This movie warns us of how gene modification could become problematic, with humans playing god and the ethical implications that creates.
     Biotechnology is not only used on humans, it is also used to modify plants to make them more draught resistant, extend their blooming season, or even to fuse multiple plants into one. A pluot is a fusion between a plum and an apricot. While that modification is simply for taste, the artistry of other genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have helped prevent starvation and allowed more widespread farming of different fruits and vegetables.



References


Ball, Philip. “Designer Babies: an Ethical Horror Waiting to Happen?” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 8 Jan. 2017.

“GMOs Help Farmers Keep America Growing.” Coalition for Safe Affordable Food.

“Math and Art: The Good, the Bad, and the Pretty.” Math and Art: The Good, the Bad, and the Pretty | Mathematical Association of America.

Stutz, Bruce. “Seed Magazineabout.” On Overconfidence § SEEDMAGAZINE.COM.

Tyson, Peter. “Describing Nature With Math.” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 10 Nov. 2011.